Hello, Rolex replica watch lovers. I’m specifically addressing you because today I’m going to talk about a Rolex model that never ceases to be in vogue. The years pass, but its popularity does not decrease. It is about the 124060 No-date model, which, besides being extremely comfortable, is also extremely attractive.
I can attribute many complements to this model. But I will take them one by one to avoid confusion. The good part of things is that I have 2 identical watches by model, but different in their level of quality.
So, today I will compare an AAA-grade 124060 No-date with one from the “Swiss replica” series. I received these 2 models in stock recently and I can’t wait to discover their differences.
If you are familiar with the replica industry, you surely know that it offers different levels of quality. Everything starts with A-grade replicas and ends with super-Swiss clones. From my own experience, I can confirm that an A-replica watch is always inferior to a super-clone. At the same time, not every super-clone is perfect, as many may think.
What I mean is that the replica industry seems to be a lottery. Sometimes, you can come across a better-executed AAA-replica watch than a super-clone. Even if it sounds unbelievable, this is the truth. For this reason, it is important to communicate with the supplier from whom you plan to buy the watch. It is advisable to discuss the quality of the mechanism, its water resistance, as well as to ask for pictures that would help you better understand what kind of watch you are dealing with. With this informative note, let’s see how good or not our “heroes” are and if they are worth the price.
AAA-grade Submariner 124060 replica watch
Let’s start with the simpler model, that is, the one from the AAA series. Its first advantage is its very affordable price. It is about a price of around $250, which I consider quite ok for a Rolex replica watch.
However, I think that the decisive factor should not be the price, but its quality. The first impression I made about this watch is that it is quite heavy and has a pretty remarkable finish. I can’t say it’s the most flawless finish I’ve ever come across. But it’s acceptable and better than other $250 watches.
Generally speaking…
The authentic 124060 model stands out for its exceptional finish. It is something combined between matte and slightly polished, which is very difficult to obtain in the replica industry. I have to admit that the replica watch has a different finish than what I see in the original model. However, it is executed qualitatively and smoothly.
The dial of the AAA-replica model is black with correct hour markers. The manufacturers have identically replicated the shapes of the hour markers, keeping the rectangular and round shapes, as well as their proportions. According to manufacturers, hour markers have a lume filling, which makes them visible and bright in the dark. I have to admit that the brightness in the dark is mediocre and lacks the strong effect that is often found in clone replicas.
Further on…
The inscriptions on the dial look good if I look at the watch from a distance. If you still bring it close to your eyes, you will notice slight inaccuracies in the size of the letters and their silhouette.
The metal of this watch is 316l stainless steel. I didn’t even expect it to be 904l, because otherwise, the watch would be more expensive. The bracelet feels quite firm on the wrist. But the closing mechanism seems to be a bit too loose. I have the impression that it can detach at any moment, and it’s not exactly a pleasant feeling. I hope that my doubts will not come true and that the closing mechanism will be of sufficient quality so that the watch does not fall off the wrist.
Aesthetically, this AAA-replica watch looks nice, accurate, and carefully executed. The crown is well fixed to the case, just like the bezel. The diameter of the watch is 41mm, as it should be according to the standard of the authentic watch. The watch works based on a Japanese mechanism that registers slight deviations in the precise indication of the time.
What about the Swiss-clone Submariner No-Date 124060?
The previous passage concludes that the AAA-replica model is quite decent but still mediocre. I can say that it is worth the money because the deviations I noticed in it are not critical at all.
Now let’s move on to its “competitor”, i.e. the Swiss-grade model.
The first thing to notice in it was the “WOW” effect that you get when you see a watch that grabs you immediately. It has a kind of charisma and refinement in it that is somehow missing from the one from the AAA series. First of all, the finish of the construction is much more pleasant to the touch. It, like the AAA model, is not identical to the original watch. But it is very close to being identical. Its finish is very carefully processed on each of the edges and corners of the watch. The transition between the bezel surfaces and the bracelet links is very refined. The watch has a luxurious shine that I hope will not disappear over time. The Swiss-replica construction of this Submariner is made of 904l stainless steel, which explains the gorgeous shine and texture.
Analyzing the watch dial…
I notice that the black on the dial plate is more intense than in the version described above. The hour markers and hour hands are correct in proportions and position. What is different about this watch is the brightness of the hour markers. This time, the manufacturers filled them with SuperLuminova material, which is much stronger and more durable in comparison to the traditional lume.
What attracts me to this watch is its black ceramic cutwork bezel with white minute markers. Unlike the AAA model, it has a more careful and precise execution. The cutwork technique is also applied in the execution of the crown of this watch. It seems that the manufacturers put more effort into reproducing this model. The AAA version has a crown with slightly stiffer edges. In this Swiss replica though, I can clearly see the mastery of the execution of the crown, as well as other details.
The glass on the dial is sapphire crystal with a protective layer against reflection. In contrast, the previous model, i.e. the AAA-Submariner, has mineral glass. Visibility through the glass is much better in the Swiss-clone watch. In contrast, the AAA-grade watch also has an anti-reflective coating, but it is not as “perfect” as in the Swiss model.
Technical details
In addition to all the benefits of the Swiss-clone model, the watch runs on a Swiss ETA kinetic movement mechanism. That’s a major benefit that justifies the roughly $800 price tag of this watch. I know that for some, this price seems too much. But if quality is the number one priority, then this price is not too high at all.
The accuracy of the mechanism is truly impressive. And I can confirm it because I tested this watch for a few days. It showed me a deviation of only a few seconds per day, which is acceptable for a quality watch.
Another distinctive aspect is the water resistance profile of this Submariner. According to the manufacturers, it can withstand up to 100 meters, which makes it a true diver. By the way, the AAA version of this model has a resistance of 25 meters. It’s not bad for $250, but there is room for better, as you can see in the Swiss replica model.
Final thoughts
Comparing these 2 replica watches, I can say that both are admirable. The AAA-grade version is admirable for its advantageous price vs the decent accuracy with which it was executed. It is true that technically it is inferior to its competitor. But it is acceptable for those who do not plan aquatic activities with this watch on their wrist.
On the other hand, the Swiss clone is superior in all aspects. And I mean specifically the technical profile, the wonderful aesthetic, and the careful execution of the details. Does it justify its price? Absolutely. It is accurate, well-functioning, and extremely gorgeous.